Saturday, December 23, 2006

Additional Arguments Accepted in Supreme Court Case

The Advertiser this morning carries a brief story reporting on a additional filings that Lafayette made in the Naquin bond case.

That post-oral argument filling is, as I understand it, unusual. There is no discussion of what points the city made, much less why this unusual step was taken. The closest the article comes to reporting on substance is a quote from Terry Huval:
"We wanted to provide them with some additional information to help them keep everything in perspective, since it is a complex matter."
Frustratingly uniformative.

Huval is also careful to warn that no one knows when the court will render a verdict.

All we can do is wait......